Apple Music vs. YouTube Music: Which service is better? (2026)

Two services, one decision: see at a glance where Apple Music and YouTube Music differ and who each one is right for.

Last checked:

Quick verdict

  • Both cost the same on the individual plan (€11.99).
  • Apple Music wins on sound: Hi-Res Lossless up to 24-bit/192 kHz + Dolby Atmos.
  • Apple Music pays artists roughly 6.3 times as much per stream.

Apple Music is the better fit for: iPhone & AirPods owners, classical fans.

YouTube Music is the better fit for: Android users, remix and live hunters.

Every difference in detail

Apple Music and YouTube Music compared head to head
Criterion The Ecosystem Apple Music The Archive YouTube Music
Individual plan €11.99 €11.99
Family plan €19.99 €18.99 Best value
Students €6.99 €5.99 Best value
Audio quality Hi-Res Lossless up to 24-bit/192 kHz + Dolby Atmos Best value 256 kbps AAC (no lossless)
Hi-res (24-bit/192 kHz) Yes Best value No
Dolby Atmos Yes Best value No
Offline downloads Yes Yes
Synced lyrics Yes Yes
Podcasts in the app No – separate Podcasts app Yes Best value
Audiobooks included No No
Upload your own music Yes – iCloud Music Library Yes – up to 100,000 tracks
CarPlay & Android Auto Yes Yes
Sonos Yes Yes
Stream to speakers & streamers Yes – AirPlay Yes – Chromecast
Artist payout per stream $0.007–0.01 Best value $0.0007–0.002
Payout model Pro-rata without minimum threshold Pro-rata, heavily ad-funded
Catalogue 100M+ tracks 100M+ tracks + the YouTube archive
Biggest strength Spatial Audio & Apple Music Classical included Endless live recordings, covers & remixes
Best for iPhone & AirPods owners, classical fans Android users, remix and live hunters

Strengths and weaknesses

Apple Music

Strengths

  • Dolby Atmos & hi-res at no extra cost
  • Apple Music Classical included

Weaknesses

  • Best experience only inside Apple’s world

YouTube Music

Strengths

  • Finds songs from fragments of lyrics

Weaknesses

  • No lossless, no hi-res

More comparisons